US Military Aircraft and First Group of Troops Land in Nigeria

Soldiers disembark from a U.S. military transport plane while ground crews unload cargo at an airbase.

The first contingent of United States troops and military aircraft has arrived in Nigeria to support joint operations against the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP).

According to reports, five U.S. military cargo planes landed in the northeast region, with Maiduguri Airbase in Borno State serving as the primary hub for the deployment.

A U.S. military aircraft touched down in Maiduguri on Thursday night, followed by additional arrivals by Friday evening. One C-17A landed at Kainji Airbase, while three C-17As and one C-130J-30 headed to Maiduguri. All aircraft departed their bases on the same day they landed, indicating heavy equipment transport.

President Donald Trump approved the deployment of 200 U.S. soldiers to train Nigerian forces in air and infantry operations, intelligence gathering, and eliminating Boko Haram and ISWAP insurgents.

The troops are scheduled to arrive in the coming weeks, providing advisory and technical guidance without direct combat involvement. Maiduguri Airbase will likely be the main operations center, as ISWAP controls much of Borno State’s rural areas.

This move follows U.S. airstrikes on Christmas Day 2025 targeting ISIS-linked militants in Sokoto State, described as joint operations with Nigeria.

The deployment signals enhanced U.S.-Nigeria security cooperation amid escalating threats from Boko Haram and banditry.

Analysts suggest the volume of aircraft indicates delivery of advanced equipment, possibly including MQ-9 Reaper drones and attack helicopters.

The initiative underscores U.S. commitment to counter-terrorism in West Africa, with Nigeria’s service chiefs arriving in Maiduguri to coordinate. As operations unfold, this partnership aims to bolster Nigerian efforts against insurgents.

“The deployment follows U.S. airstrikes on Christmas Day 2025 and aligns with broader efforts like the US lawmakers’ bill on Christian persecution in Nigeria.”

El-Rufai Anticipates Arrest Upon Return to Nigeria

Nasir El-Rufai in confrontation with security agents at Abuja airport Nigeria

Former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai has raised alarms over a potential plot by the federal government to arrest him upon his return to Nigeria.

In an interview with BBC Hausa on February 11, 2026, El-Rufai claimed that four of his close associates have already been detained, signaling that he may be next.

He described the actions as politically motivated, aimed at silencing critics of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) administration under President Bola Tinubu.

El-Rufai, who recently defected to the African Democratic Congress (ADC), stated that security operatives are targeting opposition figures using state institutions.

“Four people we worked with in Kaduna have been arrested, so it’s only a matter of time before they come for me too,” he said.

The former governor, who has intensified his criticism of the government, suggested that the arrests are part of a broader effort to harass perceived critics and suppress dissent.

The allegations come amid rising political tension in Nigeria, with El-Rufai’s lawyers issuing a statement condemning what they called “illegal attempts” to detain him on trumped-up charges.

He emphasized that such actions disregard the rule of law and constitutional safeguards. The situation has drawn attention to executive overreach, with calls for the government to respect democratic principles.

El-Rufai’s defection and outspoken stance have positioned him as a key opposition voice ahead of the 2027 elections.

“The former governor, who has intensified his criticism of the government, suggested that the arrests are part of a broader effort to harass perceived critics, as seen in his earlier statement on APC not ruling forever in 2027.”

Analysts view the developments as indicative of efforts to weaken potential challengers. The government has not responded directly to the claims, but security agencies continue investigations into El-Rufai’s governance from 2015 to 2023, which he insists are baseless.

This incident highlights ongoing concerns about political freedom in Nigeria, with implications for the country’s democratic landscape.

The situation has escalated with El-Rufai filing an N1bn suit against ICPC over residence invasion.

US Lawmakers Introduce a Bill to Address Nigeria’s Persecution of Christians

American flag waving on pole against blue sky as patriotic symbol

U.S. lawmakers have introduced the Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act of 2026 (HR 7457), aiming to address religious persecution and mass atrocities against Christians in Nigeria.

Sponsored by Representatives Riley Moore (R-WV) and Chris Smith (R-NJ), Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Africa Subcommittee, along with other key members from the Appropriations and Foreign Affairs Committees, the bill requires the U.S. Secretary of State to submit annual reports to Congress detailing U.S. efforts to combat these issues.

The legislation calls for a comprehensive review of how the Nigerian government respects religious freedom and protects vulnerable communities, particularly Christians.

It also urges consideration of designating Fulani ethnic militias as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) due to their alleged involvement in violent acts.

The bill proposes sanctions on entities like Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria (MACBAN), Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore, and former Kano Governor Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, amid accusations of contributing to the violence.

This initiative builds on President Donald Trump’s designation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) for religious freedom violations, emphasizing the need for stronger U.S. action.

“The bill proposes sanctions on entities like the Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association, amid ongoing US military deployments to Nigeria against Boko Haram and banditry.”

The bill highlights ongoing threats, including attacks on Christian communities, which have resulted in thousands of deaths and displacements in recent years.

Lawmakers like Moore have stressed that the U.S., as a Christian nation, must stand with persecuted Christians globally, noting non-combative cooperation with Nigeria through special forces and security agreements.

The legislation seeks to condition U.S. security assistance on Nigeria’s progress in addressing these atrocities.

The bill has garnered support from advocates for religious freedom, who see it as a step toward accountability. However, it may face challenges in implementation, as Nigeria has rejected similar designations in the past.

This development underscores growing international scrutiny of Nigeria’s handling of religious violence and could influence future bilateral relations. “The deployment has begun, with the first US troops and aircraft landing in Nigeria.”

1949 Massacre: UK Court Orders 21 Nigerian Families to Receive ÂŁ420 Million

Union Jack UK flag flying on building against blue sky

The Enugu State High Court has issued a landmark ruling ordering the British government to pay ÂŁ20 million to each of the families of 21 coal miners killed by colonial forces in 1949, totaling ÂŁ420 million. Justice Anthony Onovo delivered the judgment on February 5, 2026, describing the incident as an unlawful and extrajudicial violation of the right to life.

The tragedy occurred at the Iva Valley coal mine in Enugu during a workers’ strike on November 1, 1949, demanding better wages and conditions.

British colonial police opened fire, killing 21 miners and injuring 51 others. The suit, filed by human rights activist Greg Onoh, sought acknowledgment of liability, a formal apology, and comprehensive compensation.

The court held the British colonial administration responsible, mandating reparations, diplomatic action, and formal apologies to the victims’ families.

This decision highlights ongoing efforts to address colonial-era injustices in Nigeria, where the massacre remains a symbol of resistance against exploitation.

While symbolically significant, some observers note the judgment may not be enforceable against the UK, as international courts or agreements could be required for implementation. The ruling has sparked discussions on historical accountability and reparations for colonial atrocities.

The case underscores Nigeria’s pursuit of justice for past violations, with potential implications for similar claims worldwide.

“The ruling has sparked discussions on historical accountability, similar to ongoing US-Nigeria security partnerships against threats.”

Opay, Moniepoint, and Palmpay are upgraded to national licenses by CBN

CBN upgrades Opay and Moniepoint to national licenses in Nigeria 2026

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has upgraded the licenses of several major fintech companies and microfinance banks, including Opay, Moniepoint, and Palmpay, to national status. This move allows these institutions to operate nationwide, expanding their services beyond previous regional limitations.

The upgrade reflects compliance with regulatory requirements, including increased capital thresholds and enhanced risk management standards.

Operators with national licenses can now open physical branches across all states, offer a wider range of financial products, and serve as salary accounts for employees. This change aligns with the CBN’s push for financial inclusion and a more robust digital banking ecosystem in Nigeria.

Fintech firms like Opay, Moniepoint, and Palmpay have grown significantly in recent years, providing mobile money, payments, and lending services to millions of Nigerians.

The national license status recognizes their systemic importance and subjects them to stricter oversight, including higher capital requirements (raised from previous levels) and mandatory geotagging of POS terminals for better transaction monitoring.

The decision comes amid ongoing reforms in Nigeria’s financial sector, where the CBN has been tightening regulations to reduce risks from rapid fintech growth. While the upgrade enhances operational flexibility, it also imposes greater accountability to prevent money laundering and ensure stability.

This development is expected to boost competition in the digital payments space, benefiting consumers with improved access to services. Further details on implementation will be monitored as the affected companies adjust to the new framework.


“The upgrade enhances digital banking amid positive forex trends such as the Naira appreciation to N1,490/$ in the parallel market.”

El-Rufai: APC May Be Voted Out in 2027 and Won’t Rule Forever

Nasir El-Rufai speaking on APC 2027 during Sokoto tour Nigeria

Former Kaduna State governor Nasir El-Rufai has stated that the All Progressives Congress (APC) will not remain in power indefinitely, emphasizing that political power in Nigeria is contestable and subject to change through elections.

Speaking in Sokoto during a grassroots mobilization tour, according to Vanguard News, El-Rufai predicted that the APC could lose in the 2027 general elections, drawing parallels to the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), which governed for 16 years before being defeated in 2015.

El-Rufai’s comments reflect ongoing internal tensions within the APC, particularly following the party’s performance in recent elections and public dissatisfaction with governance. He highlighted the need for accountability and warned that voters could reject the ruling party if it fails to deliver on promises.

“El-Rufai’s comments reflect ongoing internal tensions within the APC, particularly following the party’s performance in recent elections and public dissatisfaction with governance, such as the controversy over the $9m US lobbying contract.”

The statement has sparked debate among political analysts, with some viewing it as a critique of the current administration under President Bola Tinubu, while others see it as a call for party renewal.

The APC, in power since 2015, faces challenges including economic hardship, insecurity, and opposition criticism from parties like the PDP and Labour Party. El-Rufai’s remarks come amid speculation about the 2027 elections, where the APC’s ability to retain power will depend on addressing these issues.

This development underscores the dynamic nature of Nigerian politics, where no party has ruled perpetually since the return to democracy in 1999.

“El-Rufai’s remarks come amid escalating tensions, including his recent warning of arrest upon return to Nigeria.”

Saudi Arabia and Turkey will join Trump’s “Board of Peace.”

Donald Trump speaking at World Economic Forum podium Davos 2026

Turkey and Saudi Arabia, along with other predominantly Muslim countries, have accepted U.S. President Donald Trump’s invitation to join the “Board of Peace,” a new initiative aimed at facilitating the Gaza ceasefire and broader regional stability.

The announcement came on January 22, 2026, marking a significant step in Trump’s diplomatic efforts following the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and ongoing Middle East negotiations.

The board, chaired for life by Trump, includes founding members like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev, with the goal of overseeing post-conflict reconstruction in Gaza and resolving international disputes.

“The announcement came on January 22, 2026, marking a significant step in Trump’s diplomatic efforts following the Netanyahu’s acceptance to the Board of Peace and his successful call with Venezuelan Interim President Delcy RodrĂ­guez.”

Turkish President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄźan confirmed participation, stating it would promote peace in the region while protecting national interests. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman echoed this, emphasizing the board’s potential to address humanitarian issues in Gaza and foster economic cooperation.

This development expands the board’s scope beyond its initial focus on Gaza, incorporating Muslim-majority nations to balance representation. Trump highlighted the acceptances as “tremendous progress,” noting it could lead to trade deals and security pacts. However, some European countries have declined, citing concerns over the board’s structure and potential bias.

The inclusion of Turkey and Saudi Arabia underscores shifting alliances in the Middle East, with implications for U.S. foreign policy in 2026.

Prime Minister Netanyahu of Israel has agreed to join US President Donald Trump’s “Board of Peace,which aims to settle international disputes.

Trump and Netanyahu at joint press conference with US and Israel flags

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accepted U.S. President Donald Trump’s invitation to join the “Board of Peace,” an initiative aimed at resolving international conflicts, starting with the Gaza ceasefire and potentially expanding globally.

Netanyahu’s office announced the decision on January 21, 2026, via social media, marking him as a founding member of the board chaired for life by Trump.

The announcement followed initial criticism from Netanyahu’s office regarding the board’s executive committee, which includes Turkey, a regional rival of Israel.

Despite this, Netanyahu agreed to participate, emphasizing Israel’s role in decisions impacting Gaza’s future and security interests. Azerbaijan also confirmed its acceptance on the same day, joining as another member.

Trump’s Board of Peace was initially envisioned to oversee Gaza’s post-war reconstruction and stabilization, with ambitions to address broader global disputes.

Invitations have been extended to dozens of nations, reflecting Trump’s approach to international diplomacy. Some Western European nations have declined, citing concerns over the board’s composition and objectives.

Netanyahu’s participation occurs amid ongoing ICC scrutiny, with an arrest warrant issued for war crimes in Gaza, raising questions about the board’s objectivity. The move strengthens U.S.-Israel ties under the Trump administration, building on recent meetings at Mar-a-Lago.

This development highlights shifting dynamics in Middle East diplomacy and Trump’s influence on global conflict resolution.

$9 Million Lobbying Contract: Misplaced Priority or Image Management? Inside Nigeria’s Vigorous Struggle for International Attention

President Trump and Nigeria leader in diplomatic meeting 2026

Nigeria’s Federal Government has approved a $9 million lobbying contract with U.S. firm DCI Group, sparking intense political debate over whether the expenditure is a strategic move for image management or a misplaced priority amid domestic challenges.

The deal, signed on December 17, 2025, through Kaduna-based law firm Aster Legal on behalf of the Office of the National Security Adviser, aims to communicate Nigeria’s efforts to protect Christian communities and sustain U.S. counter-terrorism support against jihadist groups in West Africa. The initial six-month term requires an upfront payment of $4.5 million, with monthly retainers of $750,000, potentially totaling $9 million upon renewal.

The contract has drawn sharp criticism from opposition parties, who argue it reflects desperation and insensitivity, especially with Nigeria facing economic hardship, insecurity, and diplomatic pressures under President Bola Tinubu’s administration.

The African Democratic Congress described the deal as a “glaring example of misplaced priorities,” questioning the focus on foreign lobbying while citizens grapple with rising insecurity and poverty. Similarly, the Peoples Democratic Party, New Nigeria Peoples Party, and Labour Party condemned it as wasteful, highlighting the government’s failure to address local issues like banditry and economic instability.

In defense, the Lagos State chapter of the All Progressives Congress dismissed the backlash as “orchestrated outrage,” insisting the lobbying is a standard tool of modern governance to counter negative perceptions and maintain international partnerships. The agreement comes amid renewed U.S. scrutiny, including threats from President Donald Trump and potential designation as a Country of Particular Concern for religious freedom violations. DCI Group, a Republican-connected firm, is tasked with engaging U.S. policymakers to highlight Nigeria’s security measures.

This development underscores broader tensions in Nigeria’s foreign relations, particularly with the U.S., where lobbying efforts aim to mitigate risks of sanctions or reduced aid. Critics point to the absence of ambassadors and perceived diplomatic paralysis as factors exacerbating the need for such costly interventions. The contract’s scale—potentially a record for African lobbying in Washington—has amplified calls for transparency and accountability in government spending.

As debates rage, the lobbying deal highlights Nigeria’s ongoing struggle to balance global image management with pressing internal priorities.

“The backlash from opposition parties echoes concerns in other government actions, such as President Tinubu’s security directive after the Niger attack, where priorities on image vs. domestic issues are questioned.”


Oyedele Flays KPMG Over Misunderstandings in Nigeria Tax Reform

Taiwo Oyedele, Chairman of Nigeria's Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, gestures while seated at his office desk during a discussion on tax reform.

In a pointed rebuttal, Taiwo Oyedele, Chairman of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, has strongly defended the newly gazetted Nigeria Tax Act (NTA) against criticisms from KPMG Nigeria.

Oyedele accused the global consulting firm of failing to grasp the intentional policy shifts in the tax reform, labeling their flagged “errors” as misconceptions rather than actual flaws. This exchange highlights ongoing debates around Nigeria’s fiscal overhaul aimed at fostering economic stability and competitiveness.

The controversy stems from KPMG’s recent analysis of the new tax laws, where they pointed out what they perceived as inconsistencies and gaps in the legislation. According to reports, KPMG highlighted potential issues that could undermine the implementation of the reforms, including ambiguities in certain provisions.

However, Oyedele dismissed these as invalid conclusions, emphasizing that the changes were deliberate policy choices designed to simplify taxation, reduce burdens on low-income earners, and promote a self-sustaining economy. He argued that the tax reform represents a bold step toward creating a fairer system that aligns with Nigeria’s long-term growth objectives, rather than mere oversights in drafting.

Oyedele further clarified that the committee’s approach prioritizes equity and efficiency, such as streamlining tax administration and eliminating redundant levies. For instance, the NTA seeks to harmonize various fiscal policies under one framework, making it easier for businesses and individuals to comply. By addressing KPMG’s points directly, Oyedele reiterated that the reforms are not riddled with errors but are innovative solutions tailored to Nigeria’s unique economic landscape. This defense comes amid broader efforts by the Tinubu administration to revamp the nation’s fiscal architecture, which has faced scrutiny from stakeholders including international firms like KPMG.

The back-and-forth underscores the challenges in rolling out comprehensive tax changes in a diverse economy like Nigeria’s. Proponents of the reform, including Oyedele, assert that it will boost revenue without stifling investment, ultimately leading to improved public services and infrastructure. Critics, however, worry about unintended consequences, such as increased compliance costs for small businesses. As the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee continues its work, Oyedele’s firm stance signals a commitment to transparency and dialogue, inviting further input to refine the laws.

This episode also reflects the growing role of expert voices in shaping Nigeria’s fiscal policy. With the NTA now in effect, observers will watch closely for its real-world impact on taxpayers and the economy. For now, Oyedele’s clarification aims to build confidence in the tax reform process, ensuring it drives toward a more prosperous and equitable Nigeria.

“This rebuttal highlights ongoing debates in Nigeria’s fiscal policy, similar to discussions around dollar to naira exchange rate impacts on tax reforms.”